Imperfect Common Knowledge of Preferences in Global Coordination Games∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
I study a simple global game, in which I relax the assumption that preferences are common knowledge. I show that with higher-order uncertainty regarding preferences, players can at best coordinate on the risk-dominant equilibrium, regardless of whether information about fundamentals is common or private. The example also suggests that the strength of the coordinating effect of public information depends positively on the degree of common knowledge regarding preferences. I conclude by reinterpreting recent experimental results in the light of this example, and suggest alternative experimental designs to test for the effects of informational assumptions, as well as the importance of common knowledge regarding preferences.
منابع مشابه
An Experimental Study Of Uncertainty In Coordination Games
Global games and Poisson games have been proposed to address equilibrium indeterminacy in Common Knowledge Coordination games, where fundamentals are commonly known by all players. Global games assume that agents face idiosyncratic uncertainty about economic fundamentals, whereas Poisson games model the number of actual players as a Poisson random variable to capture population uncertainty in l...
متن کاملDeviator Detection under Imperfect Monitoring
Grim-trigger strategies are a fundamental mechanism for sustaining equilibria in iterated games: The players cooperate along an agreed path, and as soon as one player deviates, the others form a coalition to play him down to his minmax level. A precondition to triggering such a strategy is that the identity of the deviating player becomes common knowledge among the other players. This can be di...
متن کاملThe Theory of Global Games on Test: Experimental Analysis of Coordination Games with Public and Private Information By
The theory of global games has shown that coordination games with multiple equilibria may have a unique equilibrium if certain parameters of the payoff function are private information instead of common knowledge. We report the results of an experiment designed to test the predictions of this theory. Comparing sessions with common and private information, we observe only small differences in be...
متن کاملA review on symmetric games: theory, comparison and applications
Game theory models decision makers' behaviors in strategic situations. Since the structures of games are different, behavior and preferences of the players are different in various types of game. This paper reviews various situations of games. Here, characteristics of some common games are discussed and compared. Specifically, we focus on a group of games called symmetric games including Prison...
متن کاملWhat Logic Games are Trying to Tell Us
We present logic games as a research topic in its own right, providing attractive models for dynamic interaction between agents. First, we survey the most basic logic games. Then we show how their common properties raise interesting general issues of possible structures for games and corresponding 'game logics'. Next, we review logic games in the light of this general game logic. Finally, we di...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002